![]() The monologue provokes disturbing thoughts that keep the tension going throughout the whole film in every single scene he is in. ![]() But we understand the root of his evil and how it drives his intentions and actions. We certainly don't empathize with him - far from it. This perspective stays with us throughout the duration of the film. "You don't really know why you don't like them, all you know is you find them repulsive."Īnd at that moment, we know that he's talking about Jews and how he feels about them. Which leads to the chilling conclusion that Landa comes to. However, Landa points out that a squirrel could very well spread the same diseases, yet the farmer would likely not have the same disdain for a squirrel as he would for a rat. The farmer mentions the fact that rats spread diseases, which is why one would be disgusted by them. He goes on about rats, questioning the farmer on why there is such instant disdain for the rodent. Landa's monologue offers us a haunting look into the utter evil of the Nazi mindset. Colonel Hans Landa in Inglorious Basterds And because of that, General Hummel has more depth and is more engaging as a villain. ![]() We may not agree with his implementation of honoring those fallen warriors, but his reasoning is thought-provoking. His men died for their country and they weren't even given a military burial. He wants to honor the eighty-three Special Forces operatives that lost their lives during Operation Desert Storm. And while his "evil" intentions are defined through the threat of unleashing chemical weapons on the innocent citizens of San Francisco while holding even more citizens hostage on Alcatraz, through this monologue (and others within the script) we see his point of view. These men died for their country and they weren't even given a goddamn military burial. "Twenty of those men were left to rot outside Baghdad after the conflict ended. Touch up your dialogue with our free eBook! Here we present the ten best and most thought-provoking villain monologues that accomplish that kind of cathartic moment. And even better, the moment where you make them empathize with the villain because of that perspective - even if it's for just a brief moment (except for those truly evil characters like Hans Landa). The moment where you make the reader and the audience see the world through the villain's perspective. And to do that, you may need that thought-provoking villain monologue. That is the key to writing better villains. It ends up being a very black-and-white situation.īut what if you could blur those lines a bit - or at the very least, what if you could make the reader and the audience see the villain's point of view? And in the more disturbing cases (see below with the truly evil Colonel Hans Landa in Quentin Tarantino's Inglourious Basterds), what if you could understand the evil just a bit more when you learn the unreasonable reasoning behind their horrific intentions and actions? They have evil intentions and want to harm the hero at all costs. However, villains often become one-note ponies in that respect. And raising the stakes should be every screenwriter's goal on every single page of the script. This is most evident in the exchange between Kimble and Gerard.īut let's be honest - villains are more fun to write. He's just doing his job trying to track down a convicted murderer. Samuel Gerard (Tommy Lee Jones) from The Fugitive is clearly the antagonist - he is in opposition to Richard Kimble’s (Harrison Ford) escape - but he is not the villain because there are no evil intentions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |